Durval Menezes
2014-12-14 18:07:50 UTC
Hello Z-F folks,
Cross-posting here in case anyone's interested.
Cheers,
--
Durval.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: "zfs rollback" hanged -- what to do?
To: "zfs-***@zfsonlinux.org" <zfs-***@zfsonlinux.org>
Hello,
than half an hour.
No alternatives offered, so I proceeded as above and then imported the pool
and tried to rollback again, with the same result: zfs rollback process in
a neverending block at 'D' state.
Hard reset again, but this time I moved the disk to another machine where I
have zfs-fuse 0.7.0 installed: zfs-fuse imported the pool and processed the
rollback with no issues, in much less time than I'm taking to type this.
Seems zfs-fuse is still a very viable option for recovery, as long as one
keeps his/her pools in a version zfs-fuse can handle (v26, I think).
Crossposting to the zfs-fuse list on this, in case folks there are
interested.
Cheers,
--
Durval.
Cross-posting here in case anyone's interested.
Cheers,
--
Durval.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: "zfs rollback" hanged -- what to do?
To: "zfs-***@zfsonlinux.org" <zfs-***@zfsonlinux.org>
Hello,
Just tried to rollback a snapshot here (EL6 clone with kernel
2.6.32-504.1.3.el6.x86_64 and ZFS 0.6.3-1.1 installed from the ZFS repo),zfs rollback
Checked with "zpool iostat pool2014070601": exactly zero I/O for moreThe process shows as "D" in ps, which AFAIK means it's blocked in
uninterruptable wait for I/O.Any recommendations besides stopping whatever's possible to stop and then
hard-resetting the machine?No alternatives offered, so I proceeded as above and then imported the pool
and tried to rollback again, with the same result: zfs rollback process in
a neverending block at 'D' state.
Hard reset again, but this time I moved the disk to another machine where I
have zfs-fuse 0.7.0 installed: zfs-fuse imported the pool and processed the
rollback with no issues, in much less time than I'm taking to type this.
Seems zfs-fuse is still a very viable option for recovery, as long as one
keeps his/her pools in a version zfs-fuse can handle (v26, I think).
Crossposting to the zfs-fuse list on this, in case folks there are
interested.
Cheers,
--
Durval.
--
--
To post to this group, send email to zfs-***@googlegroups.com
To visit our Web site, click on http://zfs-fuse.net/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "zfs-fuse" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to zfs-fuse+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
To post to this group, send email to zfs-***@googlegroups.com
To visit our Web site, click on http://zfs-fuse.net/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "zfs-fuse" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to zfs-fuse+***@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.